now you have my attention that the gremlins have crept into the calculation. Pedestrians are still worse than its reputation - at least in terms of performance. Therefore, the corrected and now
something streamlined and the entire article table to show how it came about ...
the first article I let online, as a reminder of what can go wrong. At least has in the overall picture is little changed.
If you also the safety distances strictly on the driving school for 50km / h but interpreted at 20 km / H remains (increase factor of 4, then comes around 22 m to 20 km / h out) and this runs through all objects of comparison (TRAM-bus-car), would be the performance of pedestrian traffic and public transport was about 2 at max. 9.6 with respect to the first car
Overall, the whole then again calm - so wrong I was not. But a gifted computer table I am unfortunately not, and there had better luck than sense. The 90% for the environmental group from the first version of the article are so wrong, thank God, the way was not correct.
And for those who want to experiment yourself - please
Paschberg to me (et) gmx.at mail, I'll send the Excel spreadsheet on.
0 comments:
Post a Comment