valleys without railways.
(or settle by itself)
Looking at current traffic maps as on the homepage of the national transport planning
are shown, one can clearly see the most heavily loaded axes in Tirol. If we add a
average about 80 people occupied regional railway locomotive and a half-hour interval for peripheral areas of the rush hour 7-19 back provided an traffic of about 4,000 people each way.
If we add further that a car with relatively high average 1.5 people fretted is busy, this results in an equivalent number of car 2700 pieces - which has a cross-sectional load in both directions of 5400 Cars to follow. In this rough calculation, however, the peak hours and the truck portion were ignored.
one is assuming that the modal split
not a complete shift of motorized mobility proportion of cars was not possible (I stress "was", there are still coming constraints are very well force a further shift) as a daily cross-sectional load warrants of about 10,000 Cars to establish a rail and thus energy-efficient infrastructure to ensure the mobility in these areas after 2030, the approximate border year after
Olduvai theory .
accessibility is important for economic communication.
But how does it work without a car.
We have forgotten it and will have to learn again.
We still have the choice between different media. If we wait long, however, remains the only walking. That may perhaps be a very long-term advantage - for the affected communities will be again what they were: small sleepy farming villages in which you can find a man who has broken his foot, giving the last rites must. But probably would not (even from the Tyrolean heritage groups) more voluntarily returned to the pre-industrial idyll. While we are at such a throwback to the Stone Age as Annektionsziel for Chinese and other probably only be interesting as a hazardous waste site - but for ourselves, such a habitat is no longer interesting. Tyrolean over 600,000 will have to emigrate.
Do is not that it means for the Tyrol, that its energy consumption must be reduced significantly. When the heating is done quite a bit. The traffic eats, but on everything. It therefore leads to no significant reduction in car traffic around - as is also electrically operated road transport will not be energy efficient especially road construction in relation to railway technical details unfortunately pure stone age.
upgraded rail lines and power densities in the urban area by additional rail lines:
Telfs - Kufstein
Wipptal - Innsbruck
Kitzbühel - St. Johann
Landeck - Imst
re-build railway lines
Landeck-Prutz
Ötztal / station - Ötz
Wörgl Kufstein - St. Johann
In terms of future development (if one time changed the mode of transport then it will be after 2030 will still cost upwards) re-build railway lines
Prutz-time or school
Landeck - Kappl (Ischgl)
Ötztal-Sölden
Telfs-Nasserreith or Imst-Nasserreith
Nasserretih-Ehrwald
Reutte-Elmen
Fulpmes-Milders
Jenbach-Achenpass
Kitzbühel Mittersill-Lienz
Kufstein Kössen
St. Johann Waidring-Berchtesgaden
The race is on.
The decision, which can be time and hope that everything is not always so bad (you have to consider and weigh it before?) Noted - it is perhaps worse.
The places in any of those areas that do not make it, will disappear on the global maps.
